EB-1C Dismissed — Restaurant (2022): the motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner's

Decision Summary

The motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner's new evidence regarding a service mark was not considered substantively new and was insufficient to establish the requisite qualifying relationship. The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy, particularly regarding the untimeliness of a previous motion.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF