dismissed
EB-1C
dismissed EB-1C Case: Retail
Decision Summary
The motions to reopen and reconsider were denied because they were untimely filed. The petitioner submitted the motions 35 days after the AAO's unfavorable decision was served by mail, exceeding the 33-day filing deadline.
Criteria Discussed
Timeliness Of Motion
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
MATTER OF A-H- INC. Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: MAR. 30, 20 I 7 MOTION ON ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS OFFICE DECISION PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, a furniture retailer, seeks to permanently employ the Beneficiary as its president under the first preference immigrant classification for multinational executives or managers. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(l)(C), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(l)(C). This classification allows a U.S. employer to permanently transfer a qualified foreign employee to the United States to work in an executive or managerial capacity. The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition and affirmed the denial after reopening the case on the Petitioner's motion. We dismissed the subsequent appeal. The matter is now before us on a motion to reopen and a motion to reconsider. Upon review, we will deny the motions assigned this receipt number as untimely filed. A motion must be filed within 33. calendar days of the date that the unfavorable decision was served by mail. 8 C.F.R. ยงยง 1 03.5(a)(l )(i), 103.8(b ). The filing date is the day USCIS receives the motion at the designated filing location, not the date the Petitioner mailed the motion. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103 .2( a)(7)(i). On October 19, 2016, we dismissed the Petitioner's appeal and served the unfavorable decision by mail. The decision stated that the Petitioner may tile a motion within 33 days. USCIS received the motions assigned a receipt number ending in 7 on November 23, 2016, which is 35 days after the service date of the unfavorable decision. Accordingly, we are denying these motions as untimely filed. Prior to these motions, USCJS received a duplicate motion to reopen and a motion to reconsider assigned a receipt number ending in 2. We reviewed the merits of those motions and issued a separate decision. ORDER: The motion to reopen is denied. FURTHER ORDER: The motion to reconsider is denied. Cite as Matter of A-H- Inc., ID# 288874 (AAO Mar. 30, 2017)
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.