EB-1C Dismissed — Retail (2018): did not establish the beneficiary was employed in a

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the beneficiary was employed in a qualifying managerial or executive capacity abroad. The AAO found the description of the beneficiary's foreign duties to be overly vague, generic, and lacking specific examples of high-level tasks. Additionally, the petitioner did not resolve a material discrepancy in the record concerning the length of the beneficiary's employment abroad.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF