EB-1C Dismissed — Retail Management (2024): did not meet the requirements for a motion to reopen or

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the requirements for a motion to reopen or reconsider. The AAO found that the petitioner did not submit new facts and documentary evidence for the motion to reopen, nor did it establish that the Director's initial decision was based on an incorrect application of law for the motion to reconsider. Key deficiencies, such as proving the ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date, remained unaddressed.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF