EB-1C Dismissed — Steel Trading (2023): did not establish the beneficiary would be employed in a

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a qualifying executive capacity. The petitioner submitted multiple, inconsistent iterations of the beneficiary's job duties, which confused rather than clarified the proposed role. Due to these unresolved discrepancies, the AAO could not determine what tasks the beneficiary would actually perform or conclude that they would be primarily executive duties.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF