dismissed EB-1C

dismissed EB-1C Case: Trucking

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Trucking

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to submit a brief or additional evidence within the 30-day timeframe as promised. Furthermore, the petitioner did not identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact from the director's initial denial, as required by regulations.

Criteria Discussed

Managerial Or Executive Capacity (Foreign Employment) Managerial Or Executive Capacity (U.S. Employment) Qualifying Relationship

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
Identifying data deleted to 
prevent clez.i"ly unwarranted 
invasion of personal priV8C) 
PUBLIC COpy 
DATE: 
NAY 0 9 2012 
INRE: 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 
Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 
20 Massachusetts Ave. N.W., MS 2090 
Washington, DC 20529-2090 
u.s. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
OFFICE: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER 
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Multinational Executive or Manager Pursuant 
to Section 203(b)(1)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(1)(C) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned 
to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
If you believe the AAO inappropriately applied the law in reaching its decision, or you have additional 
information that you wish to have considered, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen 
with the field office or service center that originally decided your case by filing a Form I-290B, Notice of 
Appeal or Motion, with a fee of $630. The specific requirements for filing such a motion can be found at 
8 C.F.R. ยง 103.5. Do not file any motion directly with the AAO. Please be aware that 8 C.F.R. ยง 
103.5(a)(1 )(i) requires any motion to be filed within 30 days of the decision that the motion seeks to 
reconsider or reopen. 
Thank you, 
โ€ข 
PerryRhew 
Chief, Administrative Appeals Office 
www.uscis.gov 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The preference visa petition was denied by the Director, Nebraska Service Center. The 
matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be summarily 
dismissed. 
The petitioner is a California corporation that is engaged in trucking services. The petitioner seeks to 
employ the beneficiary as its president. Accordingly, the petitioner endeavors to classify the beneficiary 
as an employment-based immigrant pursuant to section 203(b)(1 )(C) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (the Act), 8 U.S.c. ยง IIS3(b)(I)(C), as a multinational executive or manager. 
On April 28, 2010, the director denied the petition based on the following grounds of ineligibility: (1) 
failure to establish that the beneficiary's employment abroad was within a qualitying managerial or 
executive capacity; (2) failure to establish that the beneficiary'S proposed employment with the U.S. 
entity would be within a qualifying managerial or executive capacity; and, (3) failure to establish the 
existence of a qualifying relationship. 
On May 27, 2010, counsel for the petitioner submitted the Form 1-290B to appeal the director's denial. 
Counsel marked the box at part two of the Form 1-290B to indicate that the brief and/or additional 
evidence will be submitted to the AAO within 30 days. The AAO never received a brief or additional 
evidence, and thus, deems the record complete. 
On the Form 1-290B, counsel states, "will file a brief along with supporting documents in 30 days." 
In regard to the director's conclusion that the petitioner failed to submit sufficient evidence to show the 
beneficiary'S eligibility for the immigrant petition, the petitioner fails to identify any erroneous 
conclusion oflaw or statement of fact for the appeal. The USCIS regulation at 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(1)(v) 
states, in pertinent part: 
Summary dismissal. An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any 
appeal when the party concerned fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of 
law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
As no additional evidence is presented on appeal to overcome the decision of the director, and no 
erroneous conclusion oflaw or statement of fact for the appeal is specifically identified, the appeal will be 
summarily dismissed. 
The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.c. 
ยง 1361. The petitioner has not sustained that burden. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.