Dismissed
EB-1C
EB-1C Dismissed — Unknown (2011): it was an improperly filed second appeal of the same
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected because it was an improperly filed second appeal of the same director's decision, which is not permitted by regulation. The AAO also noted that the petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of prior counsel was not properly supported according to the standards set in Matter of Lozada.
Criteria Discussed
Prohibition Of Multiple Appeals Appealing A Prior Aao Decision Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Claim Requirements
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-1C decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →