Dismissed
EB-1C
EB-1C Dismissed — Unspecified (2005): the motion to reopen was rejected as untimely filed, as it
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen was rejected as untimely filed, as it was submitted more than 52 days after the AAO's decision, far exceeding the 33-day filing period. The petitioner did not demonstrate that the delay was reasonable or beyond their control. The AAO also noted other deficiencies, including the fact that the beneficiary, not the petitioner, appeared to be driving the motion without proper standing or attorney representation for the petitioner.
Criteria Discussed
Timeliness Of Motion Filing (8 C.F.R. 103.5(A)(L)(I)) Proper Filing Procedure (8 C.F.R. 103.2(A)(7)(I)) Standing To File Motion Attorney Representation (Form G-28)
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-1C decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →