remanded EB-1C Case: Cosmetics
Avoid this EB-1C denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The Director denied the petition because the beneficiary's original foreign employer was legally dissolved following a merger, which was thought to break the required qualifying relationship. The AAO remanded the case, citing a recent adopted decision that introduced the concept of a 'successor-in-interest'. The Director must now re-evaluate whether the entity that absorbed the original employer qualifies as a successor, which could re-establish the qualifying relationship.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1C petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.