remanded
EB-1C
remanded EB-1C Case: Dietary Supplements
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because while the petitioner successfully established a qualifying affiliate relationship, which was the initial reason for denial, the AAO found the record lacked sufficient evidence on other key points. Specifically, there was not enough proof that the petitioner had been doing business for at least one year or sufficient detail about the beneficiary's proposed managerial or executive duties.
Criteria Discussed
Qualifying Relationship Doing Business For One Year Managerial Or Executive Capacity
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1C petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.