Remanded
EB-1C
EB-1C Remanded โ Dietary Supplements (2005): while the petitioner successfully established a qualifying
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because while the petitioner successfully established a qualifying affiliate relationship, which was the initial reason for denial, the AAO found the record lacked sufficient evidence on other key points. Specifically, there was not enough proof that the petitioner had been doing business for at least one year or sufficient detail about the beneficiary's proposed managerial or executive duties.
Criteria Discussed
Qualifying Relationship Doing Business For One Year Managerial Or Executive Capacity
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-1C decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ