EB-1C Remanded — Financial Technology (2025): the AAO determined that the Director misanalyzed the

Decision Summary

The appeal was remanded because the AAO determined that the Director misanalyzed the evidence and failed to properly examine the beneficiary's actual job duties. The Director had incorrectly interpreted the beneficiary's employment start date, U.S. role, and the company's organizational chart. The case was sent back for the Director to reconsider the executive nature of the beneficiary's foreign and proposed U.S. work based on his duties.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF