remanded EB-1C Case: Financial Technology
Avoid this EB-1C denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO determined that the Director misanalyzed the evidence and failed to properly examine the beneficiary's actual job duties. The Director had incorrectly interpreted the beneficiary's employment start date, U.S. role, and the company's organizational chart. The case was sent back for the Director to reconsider the executive nature of the beneficiary's foreign and proposed U.S. work based on his duties.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1C petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.