EB-1C Remanded — Insurance (2023): the Director's decision did not reflect consideration of

Decision Summary

The appeal was remanded because the Director's decision did not reflect consideration of the petitioner's response to a Request for Evidence (RFE). Furthermore, the Director improperly analyzed the beneficiary's role under the 'executive capacity' definition, disregarding the petitioner's consistent claim that the role was 'managerial.' These procedural errors necessitated a new decision based on the complete record.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF