EB-1C Remanded — Office Supplies Distribution (2024): the AAO concluded that the petitioner did establish that

Decision Summary

The AAO concluded that the petitioner did establish that the beneficiary's intended U.S. position is primarily managerial, overturning the director's central reason for denial. However, the case was remanded because a new issue was identified: the petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date onwards had not been sufficiently documented. The director was instructed to request further evidence on this point.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF