EB-1C Remanded — Tattoo Products Distribution (2017): the Director's initial decision was procedurally flawed,

Decision Summary

The appeal was remanded because the Director's initial decision was procedurally flawed, failing to provide an adequate analysis of the evidence or explain the specific reasons for the denial. While the AAO also found the submitted evidence insufficient to establish the beneficiary's managerial role, the qualifying corporate relationship, and the petitioner's ability to pay, it determined the case should be sent back for a new decision, allowing the petitioner to submit additional evidence.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF