remanded EB-1C Case: Tattoo Products Distribution
Avoid this EB-1C denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's initial decision was procedurally flawed, failing to provide an adequate analysis of the evidence or explain the specific reasons for the denial. While the AAO also found the submitted evidence insufficient to establish the beneficiary's managerial role, the qualifying corporate relationship, and the petitioner's ability to pay, it determined the case should be sent back for a new decision, allowing the petitioner to submit additional evidence.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1C petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.