Remanded
EB-1C
EB-1C Remanded — Telecommunications (2022): the AAO found that the Director's decision contained clear
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found that the Director's decision contained clear factual errors regarding the beneficiary's periods of stay in the United States. Furthermore, the Director failed to consider all relevant evidence submitted by the petitioner in response to a NOID and did not sufficiently disclose derogatory information used as a basis for the denial, preventing a fair adjudication and meaningful appellate review.
Criteria Discussed
Beneficiary'S Employment Abroad In A Managerial/Executive Capacity Beneficiary'S Proposed Employment In The U.S. In A Managerial/Executive Capacity Petitioner Doing Business In The U.S. For At Least One Year Foreign Affiliate Doing Business Abroad Willful Misrepresentation Of Material Facts
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-1C decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →