EB-1C Sustained — Battery Technology (2019): the Director improperly focused on the petitioner's

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the Director improperly focused on the petitioner's interchangeable use of 'managerial' and 'executive' titles while ignoring evidence of the Beneficiary's job duties. The AAO found the petitioner provided sufficient evidence to establish that the Beneficiary would be employed in a managerial capacity, specifically as a function manager, and would primarily perform managerial tasks supported by other staff.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF