sustained EB-1C Case: Battery Technology
Avoid this EB-1C denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the Director improperly focused on the petitioner's interchangeable use of 'managerial' and 'executive' titles while ignoring evidence of the Beneficiary's job duties. The AAO found the petitioner provided sufficient evidence to establish that the Beneficiary would be employed in a managerial capacity, specifically as a function manager, and would primarily perform managerial tasks supported by other staff.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.