sustained EB-1C Case: Distribution / Electronics Parts
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained upon a motion to reopen because the petitioner submitted new facts and documentary evidence successfully demonstrating a qualifying affiliate relationship between the U.S. petitioner and the beneficiary's foreign employer. The initial denial and appeal dismissal were based on the failure to establish this relationship, but the new evidence met the preponderance of the evidence standard.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 17580870 Motion on Administrative Appeals Office Decision Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date : AUG . 26, 2022 Form 1-140, Petition for Multinational Managers or Executives The Petitioner, a distributer of relays and other precision parts, seeks to permanently employ the Beneficiary as its vice president of operations under the first preference immigrant classification for multinational executives or managers. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(l)(C), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(l)(C). The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding the record did not establish, as required, that the Petitioner had a qualifying relationship with the Beneficiary's foreign employer. 1 The Petitioner later filed an appeal that we dismissed. The matter is now before us again on a motion to reopen and a motion to reconsider. On motion , the Petitioner submits additional evidence and contends this establishes that it has a qualifying relationship with the Beneficiary's foreign employer. Upon review, we will grant the motion to reopen and sustain the appeal. 2 To establish a "qualifying relationship," the Petitioner must show that the Beneficiary's foreign employer and the proposed U.S. employer are the same employer (a U.S. entity with a foreign office) or related as a "parent and subsidiary" or as "affiliates ." See ยง 203(b )(1 )(C) of the Act; see also 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(j)(2) (providing definitions of the terms "affiliate" and "subsidiary"). Regulation and case law confirm that ownership and control are the factors that must be examined in determining whether a qualifying relationship exists between United States and foreign entities. See, e.g., Matter of Church Scientology Int'l, 19 l&N Dec. 593 (Comm'r 1988); Matter of Siemens Med. Sys., Inc., 19 I&N Dec. 362 (Comm'r 1986); Matter of Hughes, 18 I&N Dec. 289 (Comm'r 1982). Ownership refers to the direct or indirect legal right of possession of the assets of an entity with full power and authority to control; control means the direct or indirect legal right and authority to direct the establishment, management, and operations of an entity . Matter of Church Scientology Int' l, 19 I&N Dec . at 595. 1 An immigrant visa is available to a beneficiary who , in the three years preceding the filing of the petition , has been employed outside the United States for at least one year in a managerial or executive capacity , and seeks to enter the United States in order to continue to render managerial or executive services to the same employer or to its subsidiary or affiliate. Section 203(b )(1 )(C) of the Act. 2 A motion to reopen is based on factual grounds and must (1) state the new facts to be provided in the reopened proceeding ; and (2) be supported by affidavits or other documentary evidence . 8 C .F.R. ยง 103.5(a)(2) . We may only grant a motion that meets these criteria and establishes eligibility for the requested benefit. As we are granting the motion to reopen and sustaining the appeal , we decline to adjudicate the motion to reconsider. On motion, the Petitioner states new facts supported by documentary evidence demonstrating that it is more likely than not that the Beneficiary's foreign employer and the Petitioner qualify as affiliates. See Matter of Hughes, 18 I&N Dec. at 289. Therefore, we conclude that the Petitioner has established by a preponderance of the evidence that it has a qualifying relationship with the Beneficiary's foreign employer. In visa petition proceedings, it is the petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the immigration benefit sought. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1361. The Petitioner has met that burden. ORDER: The motion to reopen is granted and the appeal is sustained. 2
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.