sustained EB-1C

sustained EB-1C Case: Distribution / Electronics Parts

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Distribution / Electronics Parts

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained upon a motion to reopen because the petitioner submitted new facts and documentary evidence successfully demonstrating a qualifying affiliate relationship between the U.S. petitioner and the beneficiary's foreign employer. The initial denial and appeal dismissal were based on the failure to establish this relationship, but the new evidence met the preponderance of the evidence standard.

Criteria Discussed

Qualifying Relationship Affiliate Ownership And Control

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 17580870 
Motion on Administrative Appeals Office Decision 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date : AUG . 26, 2022 
Form 1-140, Petition for Multinational Managers or Executives 
The Petitioner, a distributer of relays and other precision parts, seeks to permanently employ the 
Beneficiary as its vice president of operations under the first preference immigrant classification for 
multinational executives or managers. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) 
section 203(b)(l)(C), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(l)(C). 
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding the record did not 
establish, as required, that the Petitioner had a qualifying relationship with the Beneficiary's foreign 
employer. 1 The Petitioner later filed an appeal that we dismissed. The matter is now before us again 
on a motion to reopen and a motion to reconsider. On motion , the Petitioner submits additional 
evidence and contends this establishes that it has a qualifying relationship with the Beneficiary's 
foreign employer. Upon review, we will grant the motion to reopen and sustain the appeal. 2 
To establish a "qualifying relationship," the Petitioner must show that the Beneficiary's foreign 
employer and the proposed U.S. employer are the same employer (a U.S. entity with a foreign office) 
or related as a "parent and subsidiary" or as "affiliates ." See ยง 203(b )(1 )(C) of the Act; see also 8 
C.F.R. ยง 204.5(j)(2) (providing definitions of the terms "affiliate" and "subsidiary"). Regulation and 
case law confirm that ownership and control are the factors that must be examined in determining 
whether a qualifying relationship exists between United States and foreign entities. See, e.g., Matter 
of Church Scientology Int'l, 19 l&N Dec. 593 (Comm'r 1988); Matter of Siemens Med. Sys., Inc., 19 
I&N Dec. 362 (Comm'r 1986); Matter of Hughes, 18 I&N Dec. 289 (Comm'r 1982). Ownership 
refers to the direct or indirect legal right of possession of the assets of an entity with full power and 
authority to control; control means the direct or indirect legal right and authority to direct the 
establishment, management, and operations of an entity . Matter of Church Scientology Int' l, 19 I&N 
Dec . at 595. 
1 An immigrant visa is available to a beneficiary who , in the three years preceding the filing of the petition , has been 
employed outside the United States for at least one year in a managerial or executive capacity , and seeks to enter the United 
States in order to continue to render managerial or executive services to the same employer or to its subsidiary or affiliate. 
Section 203(b )(1 )(C) of the Act. 
2 A motion to reopen is based on factual grounds and must (1) state the new facts to be provided in the reopened proceeding ; 
and (2) be supported by affidavits or other documentary evidence . 8 C .F.R. ยง 103.5(a)(2) . We may only grant a motion 
that meets these criteria and establishes eligibility for the requested benefit. As we are granting the motion to reopen and 
sustaining the appeal , we decline to adjudicate the motion to reconsider. 
On motion, the Petitioner states new facts supported by documentary evidence demonstrating that it 
is more likely than not that the Beneficiary's foreign employer and the Petitioner qualify as affiliates. 
See Matter of Hughes, 18 I&N Dec. at 289. Therefore, we conclude that the Petitioner has established 
by a preponderance of the evidence that it has a qualifying relationship with the Beneficiary's foreign 
employer. 
In visa petition proceedings, it is the petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the immigration 
benefit sought. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1361. The Petitioner has met that burden. 
ORDER: The motion to reopen is granted and the appeal is sustained. 
2 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.