sustained EB-1C Case: Electrical Equipment Manufacturing
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner successfully rebutted the two grounds for denial. The AAO found that the director had confused the petitioning entity with another company, leading to an incorrect conclusion about the qualifying relationship. The petitioner also established its ability to pay the proffered wage by submitting a W-2 form showing the beneficiary had in fact been paid the required salary.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.