sustained EB-1C Case: Engineering
Avoid this EB-1C denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO concluded, upon de novo review, that the Petitioner established the Beneficiary was employed abroad in a qualifying executive capacity. The evidence sufficiently demonstrated that the Beneficiary directed a major component (the engineering department), was primarily tasked with establishing its goals and policies, had wide discretionary authority, and was relieved from non-qualifying operational duties by subordinate staff.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.