sustained
EB-1C
sustained EB-1C Case: Forensic Science
Decision Summary
The Director initially denied the petition for failing to establish the ability to pay the proffered wage. The appeal was sustained because upon de novo review, the AAO found the petitioner did demonstrate the ability to pay, considering the totality of the circumstances including its reputation, longevity, success, and history of paying substantial wages to its U.S. staff.
Criteria Discussed
Ability To Pay Proffered Wage
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 13459067 Appeal of Nebraska Service Center Decision Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: MAR. 24, 2021 Form 1-140, Petition for Multinational Managers or Executives The Petitioner, describing itself as a provider of forensic science and DNA testing services, seeks to permanently employ the Beneficiary as an administration director under the first preference immigrant classification for multinational executives or managers . Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(l)(C), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(l)(C). The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding the record did not establish, as required, that it had the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage. On appeal, the Petitioner contends that the evidence it submitted establishes that it has the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date onward. Upon de nova review, we conclude that the totality of the circumstances demonstrates that the Petitioner more likely than not has the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage. See 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(g)(2). The Petitioner provided credible documentation demonstrating its reputation in its industry, its longevity and success as a forensic lab services provider in the United States, and its payment of substantial annual wages to its sizeable staff in the United States. See Matter of Sonegawa, 12 l&N Dec. 612 (Reg'l Comm'r 1967). In visa petition proceedings, it is the petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the immigration benefit sought. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1361. The Petitioner has met that burden. ORDER: The appeal is sustained .
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.