sustained
EB-1C
sustained EB-1C Case: Hotel Marketing
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner successfully overcame all grounds for denial. The AAO found that sufficient evidence was provided to demonstrate the beneficiary's executive capacity both abroad and in the U.S., the qualifying corporate relationship, that the company was actively doing business, the bona fide nature of the job offer, and the petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage.
Criteria Discussed
Managerial Or Executive Capacity (U.S.) Managerial Or Executive Capacity (Abroad) Qualifying Relationship Doing Business Bona Fide Job Offer Ability To Pay Proffered Wage
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
MATTER OF H-M-C- LLC Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: SEPT. 13, 2018 CERTIFICATION OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION PETITION: FORM 1-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, a hotel marketing company, seeks to permanently employ the Beneficiary as vice president of operations, Americas under the first preference immigrant classification for multinational executives or managers. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(l)(C), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(l)(C). This classification allows a U.S. employer to permanently transfer a qualified foreign employee to the United States to work in an executive or managerial capacity. The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish, as required, that the Beneficiary would act in a managerial or executive capacity. The Petitioner later appealed the Director's decision and we remanded the matter to the Director for entry a new decision, which if adverse, would be certified to us for review. The Director entered a new decision denying the petition and certified the matter to us for review. The Director determined that the Petitioner did not demonstrate that: 1) the Beneficiary would be employed in a managerial or executive capacity in the United States; 2) the Beneficiary acted in a managerial or executive capacity abroad; 3) it had a qualifying relationship with his foreign employer; 4) it was doing business as defined by the regulations; 5) it made a bona fide job offer to the Beneficiary; and 6) it had the ability to pay his proffered wage. On certification, the Petitioner submits additional evidence and asserts that the Director should have approved the petition. Upon de nova review, we will approve the petition. The submitted evidence reflects that the Beneficiary more likely than not acts in an executive capacity abroad overseeing the extensive Latin American operations of the Petitioner which includes several foreign legal entities. The record also establishes that the Beneficiary's subordinates relieve him from performing primarily non-qualifying operational duties. Section 101(a)(44)(B) of the Act. We also conclude that the Petitioner has demonstrated that the Beneficiary will act in an executive capacity in the United States. The Petitioner has credibly established that the Beneficiary is being transferred to the United States to extend its foreign operations to the United States and Canada, while also continuing to oversee its operations in Latin America. As such, the Beneficiary will Matter of H-M-C- LLC continue to act in a similar role as that abroad when transferred to the United States, overseeing several subordinate managers and a complex organizational hierarchy. In addition, the Petitioner has also provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that it has a qualifying relationship with the Beneficiary's foreign employers. The Petitioner indicates that the Beneficiary was simultaneously employed by five different foreign employers, including wholly owned subsidiaries in Nicaragua, the Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, El Salvador, and Guatemala and it provides evidence on certification indicating that the Beneficiary was paid by the Petitioner while overseeing these entities abroad. In denying the petition on this ground, the Director stated that the submitted evidence did not demonstrate that there was common ownership between these five foreign companies and the Petitioner. We conclude that the Petitioner has submitted sufficient documentary evidence to establish that there is more likely than not common ownership between the Petitioner and the five foreign affiliates the Beneficiary oversees abroad. See section 203(b)(l)(C) of the Act. We also conclude that the Petitioner has demonstrated that it is doing business as defined by the regulations. 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(j)(2). The Petitioner submitted tax documentation reflecting that it earned substantial revenue when the petition was filed in 2014. Further, the Petitioner supplemented the record with financial documentation on certification corroborating that it did, and still does, earn considerable revenue. This evidence indicates that the Petitioner was, and is, more likely than not continuously providing goods and services. Furthermore, we determine that the Petitioner has submitted a bona fide job offer to the Beneficiary. On certification, the Petitioner submits an additional support letter from its chief executive officer indicating that the Beneficiary's position as president of operations, Americas is still being offered and that he is urgently required to fulfill its plans to expand into the North American market. Supporting evidence on the record also reflects that the Beneficiary has been working for the Petitioner for many years in an executive capacity prior to the date of this decision. As such, the Petitioner has credibly established that its job offer to the Beneficiary is bona fide. Lastly, the Petitioner has demonstrated that it has the ability to pay the Beneficiary's proffered salary. In determining a petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage, we will first examine whether it employed the beneficiary at the time the priority date was established. If a petitioner establishes by documentary evidence that it employed the beneficiary at a salary equal to or greater than the proffered wage, this evidence will be considered prima facie proof of a petitioner's ability to pay a beneficiary's salary. The Petitioner submits documentary evidence on certification reflecting that it paid the Beneficiary's proffered wage abroad prior to the date the petition was filed and that it continues to do so up to the date of this decision. Therefore, the record demonstrates that the Petitioner more likely than not has the ability to pay the Beneficiary's proffered wage. For these reasons, we find that the Petitioner has overcome the Director's grounds for denial. 2 Matter of H-M-C- LLC ORDER: The petition is approved. Cite as Matter of H-M-C- LLC, ID# 1362703 (AAO Sept. 13, 2018) 3
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.