Sustained
EB-1C
EB-1C Sustained โ Information Technology (2017): the AAO disagreed with the Director's interpretation of the
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO disagreed with the Director's interpretation of the three-year lookback period for the one-year foreign employment requirement. The AAO ruled that for a beneficiary who previously made only brief, intermittent visits to the U.S., the relevant 'entry as a nonimmigrant' for calculating the lookback period is the date they began working primarily in the United States, not their initial entry. This interpretation allowed the beneficiary to meet the requirement.
Criteria Discussed
One Year Of Qualifying Foreign Employment Three-Year Lookback Period Interpretation Of 'Entry As A Nonimmigrant'
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-1C decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ