EB-1C Sustained — Information Technology (2020): the AAO found the Director did not adequately consider

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the Director did not adequately consider evidence of the Beneficiary's high-level placement as head of the IT department, his discretionary authority, and his managerial role over subordinates. The Petitioner sufficiently explained an inconsistency regarding the number of subordinates, and the AAO determined that the Director's reference to undisclosed "other evidence" was too ambiguous to support the denial.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF