sustained EB-1C Case: Information Technology
Avoid this EB-1C denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the Director did not adequately consider evidence of the Beneficiary's high-level placement as head of the IT department, his discretionary authority, and his managerial role over subordinates. The Petitioner sufficiently explained an inconsistency regarding the number of subordinates, and the AAO determined that the Director's reference to undisclosed "other evidence" was too ambiguous to support the denial.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.