sustained
EB-1C
sustained EB-1C Case: Marketing
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the evidence demonstrated that the Beneficiary was employed in a managerial capacity abroad, overseeing the essential function of marketing and supervising a subordinate. Furthermore, the Petitioner provided paystubs and tax documentation proving its ability to pay the Beneficiary's proffered wage.
Criteria Discussed
Managerial Capacity Ability To Pay
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER C- INC. Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: JUNE 27, 2019 APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, a manufacturer and marketer of fragrances, cosmetics, skincare and other beauty products, seeks to permanently employ the Beneficiary as "Marketing Director (US Luxury)" under the first preference immigrant classification for multinational executives or managers. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(l)(C), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(l)(C). This classification allows a U.S. employer to permanently transfer a qualified foreign employee to the United States to work in an executive or managerial capacity. The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish, as required, that the Beneficiary was employed in the United States in a managerial or executive capacity. In addition, the Director determined that the Petitioner did not demonstrate that it had the ability to pay the Beneficiary. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the Beneficiary qualified as a function manager abroad based on his management of an essential function of the foreign employer and contends that the Director did not consider the totality of the submitted evidence. The Petitioner also states that it has demonstrated its ability to pay the Beneficiary's proffered wage in the United States and points to submitted paystubs and tax documentation it asserts substantiates this payment. Upon de nova review, we conclude that the record is sufficient to establish that the Beneficiary more likely than not acted in a managerial capacity while employed with the foreign employer. First, the Petitioner submitted a detailed description of the Beneficiary's foreign duties indicating that he was primarily engaged in qualifying managerial tasks overseeing an essential function of the company; namely marketing for the foreign employer's travel retail business which generates over $100 million in annual sales. In addition, the Petitioner provided documentation reflecting that the Beneficiary more likely than not delegated most non-qualifying operational tasks to a professional marketing coordinator he supervised. The submitted evidence also sufficiently establishes that the Beneficiary had the authority to hire, fire, and take other personnel actions with respect to his professional subordinate. As such, the evidence demonstrates that the Beneficiary primarily performed the duties of a function manager in his former capacity abroad. Matter of C- Inc. In addition, the Petitioner has demonstrated that it has the ability to pay the Beneficiary's proffered wage in the United States. In determining a petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage, we will first examine whether it employed the beneficiary at the time the priority date was established. If a petitioner establishes by documentary evidence that it paid the beneficiary a salary equal to or greater than the proffered wage, this evidence will be considered prima facie proof of a petitioner's ability to pay a beneficiary's salary. The instant petition was filed on August 22, 2017. On appeal, the Petitioner points to submitted paystubs and a 2017 IRS Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, reflecting that the Petitioner paid the Beneficiary $136,953.04 in 2017 while employed in the United States on an L-1 intracompany transferee visa. Therefore, we find this supporting documentation sufficient to demonstrate that the Petitioner more likely than not had the ability to pay the Beneficiary's proffered annual salary of $130,000 as of the date the petition was filed. The totality of the evidence establishes that the Beneficiary was more likely than not employed in a managerial capacity abroad and that the Petitioner had the ability to pay the Beneficiary's proffered wage. ORDER: The appeal is sustained. Cite as Matter of C- Inc., ID# 3863600 (AAO June 27, 2019) 2
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.