sustained EB-1C

sustained EB-1C Case: Musical Equipment

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Musical Equipment

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the petitioner successfully overcame the grounds for denial. The AAO found that the record, including invoices, tax returns, and financial statements, did establish that both the U.S. and foreign entities were conducting business, making it a multinational company. Additionally, the evidence was sufficient to show the beneficiary would be employed in a qualifying executive capacity, with duties focused on directing the organization rather than performing operational tasks.

Criteria Discussed

Multinational Business Employment In An Executive Capacity

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re : 6961003 
Appeal of Texas Service Decision 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date : DEC . 22, 2020 
Form 1-140, Petition for Multinational Managers or Executives 
The Petitioner, a musical equipment wholesaler, seeks to permanently employ the Beneficiary as 
"CEO/President" under the first preference immigrant classification for multinational executives or 
managers . Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(l)(C), 8 U.S .C. ยง 1153(b)(l)(C) . 
The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not 
establish, as required , that: ( 1 )the foreign entity is conducting business and thus the Petitioner is not 
a multinational company; and (2) the Beneficiary would be employed in the United States in a 
managerial or executive capacity . 
On appeal, the Petitioner refers to specific evidence previously submitted, submits additional evidence, 
and asserts that the Director erred by disregarding information and evidence that corroborates the 
Petitioner's assertions . 
Upon de nova review, we conclude that the Petitioner has overcome the grounds for denial. We will 
sustain the appeal. 
I. LEGAL FRAMEWORK 
Section 203(b )(1 )(C) of the Act makes an immigrant visa available to a beneficiary who, in the three years 
preceding the filing of the petition, has been employed outside the United States for at least one year in a 
managerial or executive capacity, and seeks to enter the United States in order to continue to render 
managerial or executive services to the same employer or to its subsidiary or affiliate. 
A United States employer may file Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker , to classify a 
beneficiary under section 203(b )(1 )(C) of the Act as a multinational executive or manager. This 
classification does not require a labor certification. 
The petition must include a statement from an authorized official of the petitioning United States 
employer which demonstrates that the beneficiary has been employed abroad in a managerial or executive 
capacity for at least one year in the three years preceding the filing of the petition, that the beneficiary is 
coming to work in the United States for the same employer or a subsidiary or affiliate of the foreign 
employer, and that the prospective U.S. employer has been doing business for at least one year. See 
8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(j)(3). 
II. MULTINATIONAL BUSINESS 
As this visa classification is for a multinational executive or manager, the Petitioner must establish 
that the Petitioner and at least one other foreign qualifying entity is doing business. In this matter, the 
Director did not consider the documents initially submitted establishing that the Beneficiary's foreign 
employer and the Petitioner both were conducting business when the petition was filed. The record 
includes numerous sales and purchase invoices, tax returns, payroll records, and financial statements 
establishing both the Petitioner and the Beneficiary's foreign employer were conducting business. The 
Director did not request more information on this issue in the request for evidence. On appeal, the 
Petitioner provides numerous documents including sales invoices, purchase orders, financial 
statements, corporate tax returns, and other documents demonstrating that the foreign entity continued 
to operate and conduct business throughout the pend ency of the petition. As the record also establishes 
that the Petitioner continues to conduct business, the Petitioner is a multinational company and is 
eligible to petition for the Beneficiary as a multinational executive or manager. 
III. U.S. EMPLOYMENT IN AN EXECUTIVE CAPACITY 
Upon de nova review, we conclude that the record is sufficient to establish that the Beneficiary would 
more likely than not act in an executive capacity in the United States. The Petitioner submitted a 
detailed and credible duty description for the Beneficiary in the United States showing he will be 
primarily engaged in qualifying executive tasks directing the management of the organization and 
establishing the goals and policies of the organization. Section 10l(a)(44)(B) of the Act. In addition, 
the record also includes evidence that more likely than not the Petitioner has a sufficient number of 
employees that will relieve him from primarily performing non-qualifying operational level tasks. The 
record sufficiently establishes that the Beneficiary exercises wide latitude in discretionary decision 
making and receives only general supervision or direction from higher level executives, the board of 
directors, or stockholders of the organization. Id. The evidence is sufficient to demonstrate that the 
Beneficiary will be employed in a qualifying position in the United States. 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(j)(2). 
IV. CONCLUSION 
The totality of the evidence establishes that the Beneficiary will more likely than not be employed in 
an executive capacity in the United States and that the Petitioner is part of a multinational organization. 
In visa petition proceedings, it is the petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the immigration 
benefit sought. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1361. The Petitioner has met that burden. 
ORDER: The appeal is sustained. 
2 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.