Sustained
EB-1C
EB-1C Sustained โ Real Estate (2022): the AAO found the Director's interpretation of the
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the Director's interpretation of the regulations regarding the qualifying period of employment to be overly restrictive. The AAO held that the beneficiary's initial entry in B-1 status before changing to L-1A status did not break the continuity of employment with the multinational organization, and the provision allowing the qualifying period to be the three years preceding entry as a nonimmigrant was still applicable.
Criteria Discussed
One Year Of Qualifying Employment Abroad Qualifying Period Calculation For Beneficiary In The U.S.
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-1C decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ