dismissed EB-2 Case: Management Consulting

1I.S. Departnlrnt of Honleland Securit) 
IJ. S. Citi~enship and Immigration Services 
Office ofAd~~ir~irstrrr~rc.e ,lpprrrls MS 2090 
Washington. DC 20529-2090 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
FILE: Office: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER Date: a 2 1 n/lD 
LIN 07 174 50450 
PETITION: 
 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced 
Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. ji 1 153(b)(2) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
If you believe the law was inappropriately applied or you have additional information that you wish to have 
considered, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen. Please refer to 8 C.F.R. ji 103.5 for 
the specific requirements. All motions must be submitted to the office that originally decided your case by 
filing a Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, with a fee of $585. Any motion must be filed within 30 
days of the decision that the motion seeks to reconsider or reopen, as required by 8 C.F.R. fj 103.5(a)(I)(i). 
@ Perry Rhew 
Chief, Administrative Appeals Office 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The Director, Nebraska Service Center, denied the employment-based immigrant visa 
petition. The matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal 
will be dismissed. 
The petitioner is an international management consulting firm. It seeks to permanently employ the 
beneficiary in the United States as an engagement manager. The petitioner requests classification of 
the beneficiary as an advanced degree professional pursuant to section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. tj 1153(b)(2). The director denied the petition on June 7, 2007. and 
the petitioner appealed the decision to the AAO. 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Sewices records state that, subsequent to filing the instant petition. 
the petitioner filed a second petition on behalf of the beneficiary (receipt number LIN 08 002 58984), 
and the beneficiary concurrently filed an adjustment application (receipt number LIN 08 002 59743; 
The adjustment application was approved on June 12,2008. Because the beneficiary of 
the instant petition has already adjusted to lawful permanent resident status, the matter is moot. 
ORDER: 
 The appeal is dismissed based on the beneficiary's adjustment to lawful permanent 
resident status.