Dismissed
EB-2 NIW
EB-2 NIW Dismissed — Chemical Industry (2022): the motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner failed to provide sufficient new evidence to overcome the prior negative decision. The AAO found the petitioner did not establish he was well-positioned to advance his proposed endeavor, as his evidence of citations was not compelling and a new job offer letter lacked sufficient detail.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Substantial Merit And National Importance Well Positioned To Advance The Proposed Endeavor Balance Of Factors For Waiver
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.