dismissed EB-2 NIW Case: Education

U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 13068613 
Appeal of Texas Service Center Decision 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date : JUNE 14, 2021 
Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (Advanced Degree, Exceptional Ability, National 
Interest Waiver) 
The Petitioner, a teacher, seeks second preference immigrant classification as a member of the 
professions holding an advanced degree, as well as a national interest waiver of the job offer 
requirement attached to this EB-2 classification. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) 
section 203(b )(2), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b )(2). 
The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner qualified 
for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that he had not 
established that a waiver of the required job offer , and thus of the labor certification, would be in the 
national interest. 
On appeal, the Petitioner submits additional documentation and a brief asserting that he is eligible for 
a national interest waiver. 
In these proceedings, it is the petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the immigration benefit 
sought. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1361. Upon de novo review, we will dismiss the appeal. 
I. LAW 
To establish eligibility for a national interest waiver, a petitioner must first demonstrate qualification 
for the underlying EB-2 visa classification, as either an advanced degree professional or an individual 
of exceptional ability in the sciences, arts, or business. Because this classification requires that the 
individual's services be sought by a U.S . employer, a separate showing is required to establish that a 
waiver of the job offer requirement is in the national interest. 
Section 203(b) of the Act sets out this sequential framework: 
(2) Aliens who are members of the professions holding advanced degrees or aliens of 
exceptional ability. -
(A) In general. - Visas shall be made available ... to qualified immigrants who are 
members of the professions holding advanced degrees or their equivalent or 
who because of their exceptional ability in the sciences, arts, or business, will 
substantially benefit prospectively the national economy, cultural or 
educational interests, or welfare of the United States, and whose services in the 
sciences, arts, professions, or business are sought by an employer in the United 
States. 
(B) Waiver ofjob offer-
(i) National interest waiver. ... [T]he Attorney General may, when the Attorney 
General deems it to be in the national interest, waive the requirements of 
subparagraph (A) that an alien's services in the sciences, arts, professions, or 
business be sought by an employer in the United States. 
While neither the statute nor the pertinent regulations define the term "national interest," we set forth 
a framework for adjudicating national interest waiver petitions in the precedent decision Matter of 
Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016). 1 Dhanasar states that after a petitioner has established 
eligibility for EB-2 classification, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) may, as matter 
of discretion 2, grant a national interest waiver if the petitioner demonstrates: (1) that the foreign 
national's proposed endeavor has both substantial merit and national importance; (2) that the foreign 
national is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor; and (3) that, on balance, it would be 
beneficial to the United States to waive the requirements of a job offer and thus of a labor certification. 
The first prong, substantial merit and national importance, focuses on the specific endeavor that the 
foreign national proposes to undertake. The endeavor's merit may be demonstrated in a range of areas 
such as business, entrepreneurialism, science, technology, culture, health, or education. In 
determining whether the proposed endeavor has national importance, we consider its potential 
prospective impact. 
The second prong shifts the focus from the proposed endeavor to the foreign national. To determine 
whether he or she is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor, we consider factors including, 
but not limited to: the individual's education, skills, knowledge and record of success in related or 
similar efforts; a model or plan for future activities; any progress towards achieving the proposed 
endeavor; and the interest of potential customers, users, investors, or other relevant entities or 
individuals. 
The third prong requires the petitioner to demonstrate that, on balance, it would be beneficial to the 
United States to waive the requirements of a job offer and thus of a labor certification. In performing 
this analysis, USCIS may evaluate factors such as: whether, in light of the nature of the foreign 
national's qualifications or the proposed endeavor, it would be impractical either for the foreign 
national to secure a job offer or for the petitioner to obtain a labor certification; whether, even assuming 
1 In announcing this new framework. we vacated our prior precedent decision, Matter of New York State Department of 
Transportation. 22 l&N Dec. 215 (Act. Assoc. Comm'r 1998) (NYSDOT). 
2 See also Poursina v. USC1S. No. 17-16579, 2019 WL 4051593 (Aug. 28, 2019) (finding USCIS' decision to grant or 
deny a national interest waiver to be discretionary in nature). 
2 
that other qualified U.S. workers are available, the United States would still benefit from the foreign 
national's contributions; and whether the national interest in the foreign national's contributions is 
sufficiently urgent to warrant forgoing the labor certification process. In each case, the factor(s) 
considered must, taken together, indicate that on balance, it would be beneficial to the United States 
to waive the requirements of a job offer and thus of a labor certification. 3 
II. ANALYSIS 
The Director found that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced 
degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of 
the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. For the 
reasons discussed below, we agree with the Director that the Petitioner has not sufficiently 
demonstrated the national importance of his proposed endeavor under the first prong of the Dhanasar 
analytical framework. 
Regarding his claim of eligibility under Dhanasar' s first prong, the Petitioner indicated that his proposed 
endeavor in the United States "is to work as a public school teacher. The subjects he will teach include 
English, English as a second language (ESL), and philosophy." The Petitioner further stated: 
"Specifically, his endeavor is to teach English to English language learners (ELLs) .... He intends to 
work at a public school in Oregon teaching, among other subjects, ESL, Spanish, English, and 
philosophy." In response to the Director's request for evidence (RFE), the Petitioner reiterated that his 
undertaking involves "working as a public school teacher instructing ELLs." 
In a letter accompanying the appeal, the Petitioner asserts that his "goal is to teach language, incorporating 
literature, critical thinking, Philosophy 4 Children (P4C) and Philosophy to help improve conditions in 
the public sector, and particularly in the Latinx community in Oregon." He further explains: "As a 
teacher, I incorporate, as intrinsically essential to my endeavor, the methods of Individualizing, 
Differentiating and Personalizing each of my students learning needs and preferences. This integrated 
endeavor is what I would be brining [sic] to the USA for the benefit of high school students .... " 
The record includes articles about teacher shortages in the United States and Oregon, the value of 
bilingual education, the costs and consequences associated with high school dropouts, a shortage of 
ELL teachers, Oregon's ranking as an attractive state for teachers, limited diversity in the teaching 
profession, teachers as engineers oflearning and growth, demand for bilingual workers, and Oregon's 
need for ELL teachers. In addition, the Petitioner provided reports discussing ELL students and how 
they are being taught, the social and economic benefits of public education, ELL performance by state, 
academic performance and outcomes for ELLs, progress and challenges in raising high school 
graduation rates, and teacher shortage areas in the United States. He also offered information about 
the No Child Left Behind Act, the Bilingual Education Act, the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), 
resources for teaching children philosophy, ESL teacher requirements, immigrant teachers as a 
solution for filling early childhood education positions in Oregon, teacher salaries, school closures 
attributable to the coronavirus pandemic, andl I School District's dual language immersion 
program. The record therefore supports the Director's determination that the Petitioner's proposed 
work as a school teacher instructing ELL students has substantial merit. 
3 See Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. at 888-91, for elaboration on these three prongs. 
3 
In determining national importance, the relevant question is not the importance of the field or 
profession in which the individual will work; instead we focus on the "the specific endeavor that the 
foreign national proposes to undertake." 4 See Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. at 889. In Dhanasar, we farther 
noted that "we look for broader implications" of the proposed endeavor and that "[ a ]n undertaking 
may have national importance for example, because it has national or even global implications within 
a particular field." Id. We also stated that"[ a ]n endeavor that has significant potential to employ U.S. 
workers or has other substantial positive economic effects, particularly in an economically depressed 
area, for instance, may well be understood to have national importance." Id. at 890. 
In his appeal brief: the Petitioner points to his background, education, teaching experience, 
instructional methodology, and specialized training in his field. His appellate submission includes 
letters of support from academic colleagues and former students discussing his dissertation, 
professional development work, "Philosophy in Schools" accreditation, and personalized teaching 
approach. The Petitioner's knowledge, skills, and experience in his field relate to the second prong of 
the Dhanasar framework, which "shifts the focus from the proposed endeavor to the foreign national." 
Id. at 890. 5 The issue here is whether the specific endeavor that he proposes to undertake has national 
importance under Dhanasar's first prong. 
The Petitioner asserts that the Director's decision disrefarded a letter froml la professor 
of sociology at the University o±1 I 6 I discussed a "Philosophy of Children" 
presentation by the Petitioner as part of his graduate studies at the University o~ I She also 
noted that she evaluated his dissertation and "invited him numerous times to discuss issues connected 
to philosophical questions within education." The Petitioner claims that I ~s letter 
"demonstrates that the benefit of [ the Petitioner's] proposed research has broader implications, as [ the 
Petitioner's] methodology and research are disseminated to others in the field through presentations 
and seminars." 7 The information froml I however, relates to the Petitioner's past graduate 
work at the University o~ I (2014-2015) and does not explain how his proposed work as an 
Oregon public school teacher involves undertaking research and disseminating his findings to others 
in the field. 
The Petitioner farther argues that his proposed work as an Oregon public school teacher "would 
broadly enhance societal welfare and cultural enrichment," but he does not offer specific examples of 
4 The issue here is not the value of the U.S. education system or the impact of schooling on our country's economy, but 
rather whether the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor as a teacher in the Oregon public school system rises to the 
level of national importance. 
5 To establish that it would be in the national interest to waive the job offer requirement, a petitioner must go beyond 
showing his expertise in a particular field. The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2) defines "exceptional ability" as "a 
degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered" in a given area of endeavor. By statute, individuals of 
exceptional ability are generally subject to the job offer/labor certification requirement; they are not exempt by virtue of 
their exceptional ability. Therefore, whether a given petitioner seeks classification as an individual of exceptional ability, 
or as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, that individual cannot quality for a waiver just by 
demonstrating a degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in his field of expertise. See Dhanasar, 
26 T&N Dec. at 886 n.3. 
6 The Petitioner eamecj his "Mas
1
er of Arts in English and Language in Education" from the University ofl kn 2015. 
7 A second letter from~--~offered on appeal describes the Petitioner's "Philosoph] for Children" methodology and 
states that it had a "noticeable impact" on the academic staff at the University of1~_....,.' s Institute of Education. 
4 
such impact. He also contends that his undertaking "has national implications for the United States, 
particularly in the field of education, where there already is such a shortage in interest." In addition, 
the Petitioner asserts that his proposed "endeavor in aiding students in the public school system is 
incredibly nationally important, as seen through the severe shortage of teachers" in our country. 
Furthermore, he claims that "[h ]is expertise will no doubt bring a progressive change in the exact way 
that the Department of Education is looking to implement for a better, localized school system under 
ESSA." 8 
To evaluate whether the Petitioner's endeavor satisfies the national importance requirement we look 
to evidence documenting the "potential prospective impact" of his work. In the present matter, the 
Petitioner's evidence is insufficient to show that his proposed work has broader implications for his 
field, as opposed to being limited to the students at the school where he intends to teach. While the 
Petitioner offered articles indicating that both the United States and Oregon face a shortage of ELL 
teachers, this reported shortage does not render the work of an individual teacher nationally important 
under the Dhanasar framework. 9 In general, the value of qualified English teachers to U.S. national 
educational initiatives is collective, and the Petitioner has not shown that his proposed work as a public 
school teacher stands to have wider implications in the fields of ESL, philosophy, or education. 
The Petitioner's documentation is not sufficient to demonstrate that his proposed endeavor is of 
national importance under the Dhanasar framework. While we acknowledge the merits of his work 
to create a positive learning environment and improve his students' language proficiency and their 
preparation for future careers, the record does not demonstrate that the Petitioner's proposed teaching 
activities offer benefits that extend beyond his particular school to impact the field of education more 
broadly. 10 Accordingly , the Petitioner's proposed work does not meet the first prong of the Dhana sar 
framework. 
Because the documentation in the record does not establish the national importance of his proposed 
endeavor as required by the first prong of the Dhanasar precedent decision, the Petitioner has not 
demonstrated eligibility for a national interest waiver. Further analysis of his eligibility under the second 
and third prongs outlined in Dhanasar, therefore, would serve no meaningful purpose. 
III. CONCLUSION 
As the Petitioner has not met the requisite first prong of the Dhanasar analytical framework, we conclude 
that he has not established he is eligible for or otherwise merits a national interest waiver as a matter 
of discretion. The appeal will be dismissed for the above stated reasons, with each considered as an 
independent and alternate basis for the decision. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 
8 The record, however, does not include any letters of support from the U.S. Department of Education or the Oregon 
Department of Education to corroborate the Petitioner's claim. 
9 We note that the U.S. Department of Labor addresses shortages of qualified workers through the labor certification 
process. Accordingly, a shortage alone does not demonstrate that waiving the requirement of a labor certification would 
benefit the United States. 
10 Likewise, in Dhanasar , we determined that the petitioner 's teaching activities did not rise to the level of having national 
importance because they would not impact his field more broadly. Id. at 893. 
5