EB-2 NIW Dismissed โ Electrical Engineering (2022): the motion to reopen/reconsider was dismissed because the
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen/reconsider was dismissed because the petitioner failed to provide sufficient new facts or demonstrate an incorrect application of law. The submitted letters were not considered new material as they only elaborated on previously considered evidence. The petitioner failed to overcome the original finding that he was not well-positioned to advance his proposed endeavor, as he did not show his work had generated substantial positive discourse or served as an impetus for progress in his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.