remanded EB-2 NIW Case: Artificial Intelligence
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner did, in fact, meet the second and third prongs of the Dhanasar framework, contrary to the Director's initial finding. The AAO determined that the petitioner's significant citation record, peer-reviewed publications, and evidence of his work's influence and implementation by others in the field of AI and natural language processing were sufficient to demonstrate he is well-positioned to advance his proposed endeavor and that a waiver would be beneficial to the United States.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
(b)(6) (b)(6) (b)(6) (b)(6)
Draft your EB-2 NIW petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft uses real AAO decisions to generate compliant petition arguments tailored to your evidence.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.