dismissed EB-3 Case: Asbestos Removal
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate a continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date. The director found, and the AAO agreed, that the evidence submitted, including tax returns and the beneficiary's W-2s, did not establish that the petitioner had sufficient net income or had been paying the beneficiary a salary equal to or greater than the proffered wage.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.
Start a Stronger Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.