EB-3 Dismissed — Automotive Service (2006): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision. The petitioner's counsel indicated they would send a brief and/or evidence but failed to do so and subsequently withdrew, leaving the director's decision unchallenged.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF