Dismissed
EB-3
EB-3 Dismissed — Beauty Supply (2024): the motions were dismissed because they were filed by the
Decision Summary
The motions were dismissed because they were filed by the deceased petitioner's son, who was found to lack legal standing. The original petitioner was a sole proprietor, and under the law, the business ceased to exist upon his death. Therefore, his son is not considered an 'affected party' eligible to file motions in this proceeding.
Criteria Discussed
Standing To File A Motion Successor-In-Interest Job Portability (Ina 204(J)) Ability To Pay Beneficiary'S Qualifications
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-3 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →