EB-3 Dismissed — Carpentry (2017): the Director found substantial and probative evidence that

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the Director found substantial and probative evidence that the beneficiary had previously entered into a fraudulent marriage to evade immigration laws. This finding was based on numerous discrepancies and contradictory answers given by the beneficiary and his then-spouse during a prior immigration interview, which triggered a bar to approval of the current petition under section 204(c) of the Act.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF