dismissed
EB-3
dismissed EB-3 Case: Construction
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed as moot. The petitioner's only contention was that the petition should have been considered under the skilled worker classification. While this appeal was pending, the petitioner filed a separate skilled worker petition for the same beneficiary, which was approved, rendering the current appeal moot.
Criteria Discussed
Professional Classification Skilled Worker Classification
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ยท MATTER OF C-H-&A- Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: MAR. 20,2018 APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION PETITION: FORM 1-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, a sheet metal contractor, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a construction manager. It requests classification of the Beneficiary as a professional under the third preference immigrant classification. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), section 203(b)(3)(A)(ii), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(3)(A)(ii). This employment-based immigrant classification allows a U.S. employer to sponsor a professional with a baccalaureate degree for lawful permanent resident status. The Acting Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the labor certification did not require any education and therefore did not support the requested classification of professional. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the Director should have considered the petition under the skilled worker classification. Upon de novo review, we will dismiss the appeal. While the appeal was pending in this matter, the Petitioner submitted another visa petition on behalf of the Beneficiary, seeking to classify him as a skilled worker under Section 203(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act. 1 The skilled worker petition was approved utilizing the labor certification that had been tiled with the petition in this case. On appeal, the Petitioner's only contention is that the Director should have considered the labor certification in the context of the skilled worker classification. As the Director considered the labor certification under the skilled worker classification and approved the skilled worker petition filed on the Beneficiary's behait: the appeal before us is now moot and we will dismiss it on that basis. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. Cite as Matter of C-H-&A -, ID# 917182 (AAO Mar. 20, 20 18) 1 Section 203(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act allows a U.S. employer to sponsor a foreign national for lawful permanent resident status to work in a position that requires at least two years of training or experience.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.