EB-3 Dismissed — Culinary (2023): it challenged the wrong decision

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because it challenged the wrong decision. The petitioner argued against the merits of the original revocation concerning the beneficiary's work experience, but the appeal was of the Director's dismissal of their motions to reopen and reconsider. The AAO found that the petitioner failed to show that the Director erred, as the motions did not present new facts or establish an incorrect application of law as required.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF