dismissed EB-3

dismissed EB-3 Case: Furniture Business

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Furniture Business

Decision Summary

The Director denied the petition because it was accompanied by an expired labor certification. The AAO rejected the appeal, concluding that it lacks jurisdiction over cases where the denial is based on the lack of a valid labor certification.

Criteria Discussed

Valid Labor Certification Appellate Jurisdiction

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 13579797 
Appeal of Nebraska Service Center Decision 
Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Other Worker 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date: DEC. 21, 2020 
The Petitioner is a furniture business that seeks to employ the Beneficiary as an office coordinator. It 
requests classification of the Beneficiary as an unskilled worker under the third preference 
employment-based immigrant visa category. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) 
section 203(b)(3)(A)(iii), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(3)(A)(iii) . This immigrant visa category allows a U.S. 
employer to sponsor a foreign national for lawful permanent resident status to work in a position that 
requires less than two years of education, training, or experience. 
Petitions for unskilled workers must be accompanied by a valid labor certification approval from the 
U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) to establish that there are not sufficient U.S. workers who are able, 
willing, qualified, and available for the offered position. Section 212(a)(5) of the Act , 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 1182(a)(5). A labor certification expires if, within 180 days of its approval, it is not filed in support 
of a petition. 20 C.F.R. ยง 656.30(b)(l). 
In this case, the Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the pet1t1on because it was 
accompanied by an expired labor certification. 1 On the Petitioner's subsequent motion to reconsider, 
the Director affirmed the initial decision denying the petition. However, the Director's decision 
incorrectly states that the denial may be appealed to the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). 2 For 
the reasons explained below, we do not have jurisdiction over an appeal of an immigrant visa petition 
denial based on the lack of a valid labor certification . 
The AAO's appellate jurisdiction is based on a delegation of authority from the Secretary of Homeland 
Security. See Delegation Number 0150.l(U) (effective March 1, 2003). The delegation states that 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has the "[a]uthority to exercise appellate 
jurisdiction over the matters described in 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.l(f)(3)(iii) (as in effect on February 28, 
2003)" (citation corrected). Under 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.l(f)(3)(iii)(B) (as in effect on February 28, 2003), 
we lack appellate jurisdiction "when the denial of the petition is based upon lack of a certification by 
the Secretary of Labor." As this petition was denied because it was filed without a valid labor 
1 The Petitioner did not properly file the immigrant visa petition until October 1, 2018. This is after the November 1, 2017 
expiration date of the labor certification. Rejected petitions do not retain a filing date. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.2(a)(7)(ii). 
2 The Director's initial denial notice also incorrectly stated that the decision could be appealed to the AAO . 
certification, we do not have jurisdiction over this matter. Therefore, we must reject the Petitioner's 
appeal. 
There is no administrative appeal or motion from the rejection of an appeal. 
ORDER: The appeal is rejected. 
2 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.