EB-3 Dismissed — Garment Manufacturing (2017): the motions to reopen and reconsider were denied because

Decision Summary

The motions to reopen and reconsider were denied because the petitioner did not meet the applicable requirements. The petitioner failed to state new facts for the motion to reopen and did not establish that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy for the motion to reconsider. The underlying petition was denied due to a finding that the beneficiary had previously engaged in marriage fraud to evade immigration laws.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF