Dismissed
EB-3
EB-3 Dismissed — Information Technology (2020): the motions were dismissed because the Beneficiary lacked
Decision Summary
The motions were dismissed because the Beneficiary lacked legal standing to file them. The petition's revocation occurred in 2012, and the Beneficiary's appeal was filed six years later. The AAO found that a later decision (Matter of V-S-G-, Inc.) granting beneficiaries standing in some cases was not retroactive and therefore did not apply.
Criteria Discussed
Standing To File Appeal/Motion Motion To Reopen Motion To Reconsider Timeliness Of Appeal Beneficiary As An Affected Party
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-3 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →