EB-3 Dismissed — Law (2019): the motions to reopen and reconsider were denied because

Decision Summary

The motions to reopen and reconsider were denied because the petitioner, a law firm, failed to consistently demonstrate its ability to pay the proffered wage from the petition's priority date. While new evidence established this ability for 2017, the petitioner's tax returns for 2014 and 2016 showed insufficient net income and net current assets. The petitioner's claims under Matter of Sonegawa were also found to be unpersuasive and lacked sufficient documentation.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF