dismissed EB-3 Case: Law
Decision Summary
The motions to reopen and reconsider were denied because the petitioner, a law firm, failed to consistently demonstrate its ability to pay the proffered wage from the petition's priority date. While new evidence established this ability for 2017, the petitioner's tax returns for 2014 and 2016 showed insufficient net income and net current assets. The petitioner's claims under Matter of Sonegawa were also found to be unpersuasive and lacked sufficient documentation.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.
Start a Stronger Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.