dismissed
EB-3
dismissed EB-3 Case: Mechanical Engineering
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the Beneficiary's foreign educational credentials, specifically 'Carta de Pasante' certificates, were determined not to be the equivalent of a single U.S. bachelor's degree. The decision emphasized that the record lacked evidence of a 'licenciatura' or 'titulo' demonstrating the actual completion and award of a degree, which is required for the EB-3 professional classification.
Criteria Discussed
Bachelor'S Degree Or Foreign Equivalent
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
MATTER OF K-P-M-
Non-Precedent Decision of the
Administrative Appeals Office
DATE: SEPT.1,2017
APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION
PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER
The Petitioner, a machinery business, 1 seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a mechanical engineer. It
requests classification of the Beneficiary as a professional under the third preference immigrant
classification. The employment-based immigrant classification for a professional allows a U.S.
employer to sponsor a foreign national with a baccalaureate degree for lawful permanent resident
status. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(3)(A)(ii), 8 U.S.C.
§ 1153(b )(3)(A)(ii).
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Beneficiary
does not possesses a U.S. bachelor's degree or a foreign equivalent degree as required for
classification as a professional and to meet the requirements of the labor certification.
On appeal, the Petitioner states that the Beneficiary's post-secondary education represents the
equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree and, in the alternative, that the Beneficiary is eligible for the
position offered based on a combination of his education and employment experience.
Upon de novo review, we will dismiss the appeal.
I. LAW
Employment-based immigration generally follows a three-step process. First, an employer obtains
an approved labor certification from the DOL.2 See section 212(a)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. §
1182(a)(5)(A)(i). By approving the labor certification, DOL certifies that there are insufficient U.S.
workers who are able, willing, qualified, and available for the offered position and that employing a
foreign national in the position will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of domestic
workers similarly employed. Section 212(a)(5)(A)(i)(I)-(II) ofthe Act. Second, the employer tiles an
immigrant visa petition with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). See section 204
of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1154. Third, if USCIS approves the petition, the foreign national applies for
1
We note that, as of the date of this decision, the Petitioner's corporate status has been suspended by the California
Secretary of State. In any future filings, the Petitioner must provide evidence establishing that it is still operating in
California.
2
The date the labor certification is filed, in cases such as this one, is called the "priority date."
.
Matter of K-P-M-
an immigrant visa abroad or, if eligible, adjustment of status in the United States. See section 245 of
the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255.
II. ANALYSIS
A. Professional Classification
Section 203(b)(3)(A)(ii) ofthe Act provides for the granting of preference classification to qualified
immigrants who are members of the professions holding baccalaureate degrees. Thus, in order to be
classified as a professional, the beneficiary must possess at least a U.S. bachelor's
degree or a foreign
equivalent degree from a college or university. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(l)(3)(ii)(C).
Here, the Form ETA 9089, Application for Permanent Employment Certification (labor
certification), states in Section H that the minimum requirements for the position offered are a
bachelor's degree in engineering or mechanical engineering and 18 months of experience.
The record indicates that the Beneficiary possesses two "Carta de Pasante" certificates from the
in awarded in 1993 and 1999, reflecting studies leading
to the respective careers of "electrical technician" and "engineering in control and automation."
The Director concluded that these certificates do not establish that the Beneficiary possesses the
foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree. On appeal, the Petitioner maintains that the
Beneficiary possesses the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree in engineering.
For the reasons that follow, we affirm the Director's decision that the Beneficiary does not possess
the foreign equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree as required for the requested professional
classification and by the terms of the labor certification.
1. The Educational Requirements ofthe Professional Classification
The professional classification requires the Beneficiary to possess a single U.S. bachelor's degree or
a single foreign equivalent degree, not a combination of lesser degrees.
In 1991, when the final rule for 8 C.F .R. § 204.5 was published in the Federal Register, the
Immigration and Naturalization Service (now USCIS or the Service), responded to criticism that the
regulation required a foreign national to have a bachelor's degree as a minimum and that the
regulation did not allow for the substitution of experience for education. After reviewing section
121 ofthe Immigration Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101-649 (1990), and the Joint Explanatory Statement of
the Committee of Conference, the Service noted that both the Act and the legislative history indicate
that a foreign national must have at least a bachelor's degree: "[B]oth the Act and its legislative
history
make clear that, in order to qualify as a professional under the third classitication ... an alien
must have at least a bachelor's degree." 56 Fed. Reg. 60897, 60900 (November 29, 1991)
(emphasis added).
2
.
Matter of K-P-M-
It is significant that both section 203(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act and the regulation at 8 C.F.R.
§ 204.5(l)(3)(ii)(C) use the word "degree" in relation to professionals. Accordingly, the statute
should be construed under the assumption that Congress intended it to have purpose and meaningful
effect. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. v. Pueblo of Santa Ana, 472 U.S. 237, 249 (1985); Sutton v.
United States, 819 F.2d. 1289, 1295 (5th Cir. 1987). Congress' requirement of a single degree for
members of the professions is deliberate.
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(1)(3)(ii)(C) also requires the submission of "an official college or
university record showing the date the baccalaureate degree was awarded and the area of
concentration of study." Therefore, the plain meaning of the Act and the regulations is that the
beneficiary of a petition for a professional must possess a degree from a college or university that is at
least a U.S. baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree. In Snapnames.com. Inc. v. Michael
Chertoff, 2006 WL 3491005 (D. Or. Nov. 30, 2006), the court held that, in professional and
advanced degree professional cases, where the beneficiary is statutorily required to hold a
baccalaureate degree, USCIS properly concluded that a single foreign degree or its equivalent is
required. See also Maramjaya v. USCIS, Civ. Act No. 06-2158 (D.D.C. Mar. 26, 2008) (for
professional classification, USCIS regulations require the beneficiary to possess a single four-year U.S.
bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent degree).
In determining whether the Beneficiary's Carta de Pasante certificates constitutes such a degree, we
have turned to information from the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions
Officers (AACRAO) Electronic Database for Global Education (EDGE),3 which states that Carta de
Pasante certificates "represent completion of 3 to 5 years of post-secondary coursework for a
licenciatura program but does not represent completion of all degree requirements." EDGE further
states "regardless of the number of years of study, the Carta de Pasante is insufficient to determine
degree completion," such as a "licenciatura or titulo which shows that the degree was awarded."
Here, the record does not contain evidence indicating that the Beneficiary was awarded a
licenciatura or titulo showing that a degree was awarded.
The record contains evaluations of the Beneficiary's educational credentials prepared by
for and Ph.D, for
Both evaluators state that the Beneficiary's Carta de Pasante from the
that was issued in 1999 represents the equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree in
engmeenng. states that "the national accrediting board for engineers in Mexico,
accredits the engineering programs of
the He cites the website 4
3
AACRAO is "a nonprofit, voluntary, professional association of more than II ,000 higher education professionals who
represent approximately 2,600 institutions in over 40 countries." http://www4.aacrao.org/centennial/about.htm (last
visited Mar. 27, 20 17). According to its registration page, EDGE is "a web-based resource for the evaluation of foreign
educational credentials." http://edge.aacrao.org/info.php (last visited Aug. 14, 20 17).
4
See Licensure as a m Texas, https: (accessed
3
.
Matter of K-P-M-
and indicates that the state of Texas views a Mexican Ingeniero (engineer) degree from programs
that have accreditation as meeting the same standard as a U.S. bachelor's degree in
engineering for the licensing of engineers in the United States. USCIS may, in its discretion, use as
advisory opinions statements submitted as expert testimony. However, where an opinion is not in
accord with other information or is in any way questionable, USCIS is not required to accept or may
give less weight to that evidence. Matter of Caron International, 19 I&N Dec. 791 (Comm. 1988).
The translation of the Beneficiary's Carta de Pasante from 1999 states that the Beneficiary
"completed in full the studies corresponding to the career of: Engineer in Control and Automation."
However, as stated above, the record does not establish that the Beneficiary possesses a licenciatura
or titulo to demonstrate that the Beneficiary possesses a degree that is the foreign equivalent of a
U.S. bachelor's degree.
Therefore, the Petitioner has not established that the Beneficiary possesses a single degree that is the
foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree in engineering, which is required for classification as
a professional under section 203(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.
2. ·The Educational Requirements of the Labor Certification
The Petitioner must also establish that the Beneficiary meets all of the requirements of the offered
position set forth on the labor certification by the priority date ofthe petition. 8 C.P.R.§ 103.2(b)(l),
(12). See Matter o.fWing's Tea House. 16 I&N Dec. 158, 159 (Acting Reg'l Comm'r 1977); see also
Matter of Katigbak. 14 I&N Dec. 45, 49 (Reg'l Comm'r 1971).
The labor certification states that the offered positon requires an individual with a bachelor's degree
in engineering or mechanical engineering. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the Beneficiary
meets the requirements of the labor certification based on a combination of education and
experience. Specifically, section H.l4 of the labor certification states that "a suitable combination of
education, experience and/or training" is acceptable. However, this regulatory "Kellogg language"
is not interpreted to change the educational requirements of the offered position as stated in sections
H.4 to 13.5 Further, if the labor certification stated that the offered position could be met by a
combination of lesser education and experience equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree, the petition
would not be eligible for the requested professional classification. See 8 C.P.R. § 204.5(1)(3)(i)
("The job offer portion of an individual labor certification ... for a professional must demonstrate
that the job requires the minimum of a baccalaureate degree").
The· Petitioqer cites cases from the Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA) that equate
years of education to experience. See Donna Ricco-FYC Apparel, 201 0-PER-00359 (BALCA Mar.
23, 2011); Matter ofGlobalnet Mgmt. L.C., 2009-PER-00110 (BALCA Aug. 6, 2009). Accordingly,
August 14, 20 17).
5 See Francis Kellogg, 1994-INA-465 and 544, 1995-INA 68 (BALCA Feb. 2, 1998) (en bane). The "Kellogg language"
has been codified in DOL's regulations at 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(h)(4)(ii).
4
.
Matter of K-P-M-
the Petitioner states that the Beneficiary's Carta de Pasante certificates and his 11 years of experience
is equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering. However, these cases refer to
Specific Vocational Preparation, which is used by DOL to measure
whether alternative requirements
stated on the labor certification are "substantially equivalent" to the primary requirements as
required by 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(h)(4)(i). In addition, while 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(c) provides that
precedent decisions of USCIS are binding on alL its employees in the administration of the Act,
BALCA decisions are not similarly binding. Precedent decisions must be designated and published
in bound volumes or as interim decisions. 8 C.F.R. § 1 03.9(a).
The record also contains an evaluation prepared by Ph.D., a professor in the
who states that the Beneficiary's program of study from
the that resulted in a Carta de Pasante certificate in 1999, together
with the Beneficiary's approximately 11 years of employment experience, represents the equivalent
of a U.S. bachelor's degree in engineering. However, as stated above, the labor certification requires
that the Beneficiary possess a U.S. bachelor's degree or a foreign equivalent degree, not a
combination of lesser education and experience.
Therefore, the Petitioner has not established that the Beneficiary meets the educational requirements
of the offered position as set forth on the labor certification.
B. Skilled Worker Classification
In the alternative, the Petitioner states that the Beneficiary qualifies for skilled worker classification
based on his combination of education of education and experience. However, the Petitioner indicated
in Part 2, Item l.e., of the Form I-140 that it was filing for the Beneficiary under the professional
classification. We will not consider a petition in a different visa classification once the director has
rendered a decision. A petitioner may not make material changes to a petition in an etTort to
conform a deficient filing to USCIS requirements. See Matter of Izummi, 22 I&N Dec. 169, 176
(Assoc. Comm'r 1988). Therefore, we will not consider the instant petition in the skilled worker
category.
III. CONCLUSION
The Petitioner has not established that the Beneficiary possesses a U.S. bachelor's degree or a
foreign equivalent degree as required by the terms of the labor certification and for classification as a
professional under section 203(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.
Cite as Matter of K-P-M-, ID# 591189 (AAO Sept. 1, 2017)
5 Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.