dismissed EB-3 Case: Plant Nursery

U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF N-W-N-0-M-
APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: APR. 2, 2018 
PETITION: FORM 1-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner, a wholesa!6 plant nursery, seeks to employ the Beneficiary. It requests his 
classification as an "other worker" under the third-preference, immigrant category. See Immigration 
and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(3)(A)(iii), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(3)(A)(iii). The Director 
of the Texas Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon 
review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. 
An otlicer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned 
fails to identify speci tically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v). 
On appeal, the Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically 
identifies an erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision. On the Form I-290B, Notice of 
Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 
30 days of tiling. However, we have not received anything further from the Petitioner to date. 
Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of 
fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § I 03.3(a)( I )(v). 
Cite as Maller of N-W-N-0-M-, ID# 1432223 (AAO Apr. 2, 20 18)