EB-3 Dismissed — Restaurant: the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision, as required by regulations. The underlying substantive issue was the petitioner's failure to provide evidence that it was the successor-in-interest to the company that filed the original labor certification.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF