Dismissed
EB-3
EB-3 Dismissed — Retail (2024): the motion to reopen was dismissed because it did not state
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen was dismissed because it did not state new facts as required. The motion to reconsider was dismissed because it failed to demonstrate a misapplication of law or policy in the prior decision, and its arguments regarding portability were found to be unpersuasive as a petition must have been valid from the start to 'remain' valid.
Criteria Discussed
Ability To Pay Proffered Wage Beneficiary'S Minimum Experience Requirements Motion To Reopen Requirements Motion To Reconsider Requirements Portability Under Ina 204(J)
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-3 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →