dismissed EB-3

dismissed EB-3 Case: Skilled Worker

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Skilled Worker

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner withdrew it. The petitioner notified the service center that the beneficiary was no longer in their employ and they would no longer sponsor the petition.

Criteria Discussed

Ability To Pay Proffered Wage

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
PUBLIC COPY 
U.S. Department of Iion~eland Security 
20 Mass. Ave.. N.W.. Rm. 3000 
Washington, DC 20529 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
bL 
Petition: 
 Immigrant petition for Alien Worker as a Skilled Worker or Professional pursuant to section 
203(b)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 153(b)(3) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
Robert P. Wiemann, Chief 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The Acting Director (Director), Vermont Service Center, denied the immigrant visa petition. 
The matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be withdrawn. 
The petitioner seeks to classify the beneficiary pursuant to section 203(b)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. tj 1153(b)(3) as a skilled worker. On February 9, 2005, the director determined that the 
petitioner failed to establish its ability to pay the proffered wage and denied the petition accordingly. 
On March 10,2005, counsel filed a timely appeal on behalf of the petitioner. Subsequently, on May 2, 2005, the 
petitioner sent a letter to the Service Center to advise that the beneficiary was no longer employed by the 
petitioner, and therefore, the petitioner is "no longer in a position to sponsor his request for citizenship." 
As the petitioner is no longer sponsoring the beneficiary, the appeal will be deemed to be withdrawn. 
 The 
withdrawal may not be retracted. 8 C.F.R. 6 103.2(b)(6). 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed based on its withdrawal by the petitioner. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.