dismissed EB-3 Case: Skilled Worker

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rrn. 3000 
Washington, DC 20529 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Irmnigration 
Petition: 
 Immigrant petition for Alien Worker as a Skilled Worker or Professional pursuant to section 
203(b)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 4 1153(b)(3) 
IN BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS : 
This is the decision of the ~dminiwtive Appeals OMice in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided ydur case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DISCUSSION: The Director, California Service Center, denied the immigrant visa petition. The matter is now 
before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be summarily dismissed. 
The petitioner seeks to classify the beneficiary pursuant to section 203@)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1153@)(3) as a skilled worker. The director determined that the petitioner failed to 
establish that the beneficiary meets the experience requirements for the proffered position and denied the petition 
accordingly. 
On appeal, the petitioner indicated that it would submit a brief and/or evidence to the AAO within 30 days. The 
petitioner dated the appeal June 14, 2005. As of this date, more than seventeen (17) months later, the AAO has 
received nothing further. The AAO sent a fax to counsel of record on October 23,2006 informing counsel that no 
separate brief andlor evidence was received to confirm whether or not he would send anything else in this matter, 
and as a courtesy, providing him with five (5) days to respond. To date, five (5) weeks later, no reply has been 
received despite the fax expressly indicating that "failure to respond to this notice within five business days may 
result in the summary dismissal of your appeal." 
As stated in 8 C.F.R. 3 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned fails to identify 
specifically any erroneous conclusia of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
The petitioner here has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided any additional 
evidence. The petitioner has not even expressed disagreement with the director's decision. The appeal must therefore 
be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.