dismissed
EB-3
dismissed EB-3 Case: Software Development
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the underlying labor certification did not meet the requirements for the EB-3 professional classification. The petitioner's labor certification allowed for a combination of education and experience to satisfy the bachelor's degree requirement, but the regulations for this specific visa category mandate a single U.S. baccalaureate degree or a single foreign equivalent degree.
Criteria Discussed
Professional Classification Requirements Labor Certification Educational Requirements Bachelor'S Degree Equivalency Single Foreign Degree Requirement
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
In Re : 21182345
Appeal of Nebraska Service Center Decision
Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for a Professional
Non-Precedent Decision of the
Administrative Appeals Office
Date : JUL. 26, 2022
The Petitioner, a software development and information technology solutions company, seeks to employ
the Beneficiary as a software developer /systems analyst. It requests classification of the Beneficiary
under the third-preference, immigrant visa category for professionals. See Immigration and Nationality
Act (the Act) section 203(b)(3)(A)(ii), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(3)(A)(ii). This employment-based immigrant
classification allows a U.S. employer to sponsor a professional with a baccalaureate degree for lawful
permanent resident status .
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the minimum
education requirements for the position, as described on the labor certification, do not meet the
requirements of the requested classification . 1
In these proceedings, it is the Petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the requested benefit by a
preponderance of the evidence. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S .C. § 1361; Matter ofChawathe, 25 I&N
Dec. 369, 375 (AAO 2010). The AAO reviews the questions in this matter de nova. See Matter of
Christo 's Inc., 26 I&N Dec. 537, 537 n.2 (AAO 2015). Upon de nova review, we will dismiss the
appeal.
I. LAW
Immigration as a professional generally follows a three-step process. First, a prospective employer
must apply to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) for certification that: (1) there are insufficient U.S.
workers able, willing, qualified, and available for an offered position; and (2) the employment of a
noncitizen in the position won 't harm wages and working conditions of U.S. workers with similar jobs.
See section 212(a)(5) of the Act, 8 U.S .C. § 1182(a)(5) . Second, an employer must submit an approved
labor certification with an immigrant visa petition to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS). See section 204 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1154. Finally, if USCIS approves a petition , a
designated noncitizen may apply for an immigrant visa abroad or, if eligible , "adjustment of status" in
the United States. See section 245 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255.
1 The Director 's decision did not address the Beneficiary 's qualifications . The sole issue on appeal is whether the minimum
education requir ements indicated on the labor certification support the requested classification .
II. ANALYSIS
To be eligible for professional classification, the labor certification must require, at a minimum, a U.S.
bachelor's degree or a foreign equivalent degree. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(1)(3)(i). For the reasons
discussed below, we agree with the Director that the labor certification does not support the requested
classification. 2
Upon consideration of the entire record, including the arguments made on appeal, we adopt and affirm
the Director's decision with the comments below. See Matter of P. Singh, Attorney, 26 I&N Dec. 623
(BIA 2015) ( citing Matter of Burbano, 20 I&N Dec. 872, 874 (BIA 1994); see also Chen v. INS, 87
F.3d 5, 7-8 (1st Cir. 1996) ("[I]f a reviewing tribunal decides that the facts and evaluative judgments
prescinding from them have been adequately confronted and correctly resolved by a trial judge or
hearing officer, then the tribunal is free simply to adopt those findings" provided the tribunal's order
reflects individualized attention to the case).
On appeal, the Petitioner requests that we examine the language exactly as it appears on the labor
certification and notes that Section H. 9 of the labor certification stated that a foreign educational
equivalent is acceptable. The Petitioner asserts that the Beneficiary qualifies for the professional
classification by virtue of a foreign education equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate degree and more than
12 years experience in computer information systems and related areas.
Section J of the labor certification states that the Beneficiary's highest level of education relevant to
the job offered is a bachelor's degree in computer information systems froml I University,□
I I in I India, completed in 1997. As evidence of this credential the
Petitioner submitted copies of a diploma and a consolidated statement of marks showing that it was
awarded after completion of a three-year program. In addition, the record includes an academic
equivalency evaluation from I I from University asserting that the
Beneficiary's academic and professional work experience is equivalent to a four-year bachelor's
degree in computer information systems from an accredited U.S. college or university.
In Snapnames.com, Inc. v. Michael Chertoff, No. 06-65-MO, 2006 WL 3491005 (D. Or. Nov. 30,
2006), the court held that, in professional and advanced degree professional cases, where the
beneficiary is statutorily required to hold a baccalaureate degree, USCIS properly concluded that a
single foreign degree or its equivalent is required. See also Maramjaya v. USCIS, Civ. Act No. 06-
2158, 2008 WL 9398947 (D.D.C. Mar. 26, 2008) (for professional classification, USCIS regulations
require the beneficiary to possess a single four-year U.S. bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent
degree). Thus, for purposes of the requested immigrant visa category, a foreign equivalent of a U.S.
bachelor's degree must constitute a single degree.
Because a plain reading of the language in Part H, Box 14 and the Petitioner's own statements on appeal
clearly indicate it would accept a combination of education and experience to meet a bachelor's degree
equivalency, the labor certification does not support the requested classification. The allowance of "any
2 On the Form 1-140. Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, the Petitioner checked the box at part 2.1.e. which specifies
that the petition is being filed for "[a] professional (at a minimum, possessing a bachelor's degree or a foreign degree
equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree)."
2
suitable combination of education, progressive experience or training is acceptable" to satisfy the
bachelor's degree requirement would result in the "equivalent" of a bachelor's degree rather than a
"foreign equivalent degree." Compare 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(D) (defining "equivalence to
completion of a United States baccalaureate or higher degree" for purposes of H-lB classification.)
Where combinations of education or experience may equate to baccalaureate degrees, the Act and
regulations state so explicitly. See section 214(i)(2)(C) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1184(i)(2)(C) (allowing
H-1 B workers to have "experience in the specialty equivalent to the completion of such [bachelor's]
degree"); see also 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(C)(4) (H-lB workers may have "education, specialized
training, and/or progressively responsible experience that is equivalent to completion of a United States
baccalaureate ... degree"). The regulations pertaining to the immigrant classification sought in this matter
do not contain similar language.
Neither the Act nor USCIS regulations allow a position to be classified as a professional position if
the minimum educational requirement can be met with anything other than a single academic degree.
Therefore, the provided labor certification does not support the requested classification of professional
under section 203(b)(3) of the Act.
Further, the Petitioner asserts on appeal that USCIS refused to reclassify the requested eligibility
category from a professional to a skilled worker. We are not able to change the requested preference
classification on appeal because the Director has already issued a decision on the petition. At the
USCIS website under petition filing and processing procedures for Form 1-140, the agency provides
instructions on how to correct the visa category selected in Part 2 of Form 1-140. The guidance states
that the Petitioner must review for accuracy the receipt notice that indicates the visa category requested
on Part 2 of Form 1-140. If the category is not correct, the Petitioner must immediately call the USCIS
contact center to request a change in the visa classification before the agency makes a decision on the
form. The instructions also indicate that if the Petitioner requests a change in visa classification to
correct a clerical error, USCIS will make the final determination about whether to change the visa
classification based on everything in the case. Finally, the instructions state that a visa category cannot
be changed if a decision has been made on the Form 1-140. See USCIS website, Petition Filing and
Processing Procedures for Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers,
https://www.uscis.gov/forms/all-forms/petition-filing-and-processing-procedures-for-form-i-140-
immigrant-petition-for-alien-workers#Requesting. There is no indication the Petitioner followed any
of these steps. In any event, we are not able to change the requested preference classification on appeal
because the Director has already issued a decision on the petition.
III. CONCLUSION
The Petitioner's allowance of a combination of a degree and experience to meet the bachelor's degree
equivalency prohibits us from concluding that the labor certification supports a request for professional
classification under section 203(b)(3) of the Act.
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.
3 Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.