dismissed
EB-3
dismissed EB-3 Case: Software Development
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed as moot. The AAO found that the beneficiary had already adjusted his status to that of a permanent resident based on a different petition from another employer, which made the current appeal no longer have any practical significance.
Criteria Discussed
Beneficiary'S Educational Qualifications Possession Of A Bachelor'S Degree
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: OCT. 16, 2023 In Re: 28878552 Appeal of Nebraska Service Center Decision Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers (Professional) The Petitioner, an accounting firm, sought to permanently employ the Beneficiary as a software developer. The company requested his classification under the employment-based , third-preference (EB-3) immigrant visa category as a professional. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(3)(A)(ii) , 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(3)(A)(ii). U.S. businesses may sponsor noncitizens for permanent residence in this category to work in jobs requiring at least bachelor's degrees. See 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(1)(3)(i) (stating that a job for a professional must require "the minimum of a baccalaureate degree"). The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition. The Director concluded that, contrary to requirements of the offered job and the requested immigrant visa category, the Petitioner did not establish the Beneficiary's possession of a bachelor's degree. On appeal, the company contends that the Director misinterpreted the job' s educational requirements . USCIS records indicate that, after this appeal's filing, the Beneficiary adjusted his status to that of a permanent resident based on a later petition filed by another employer. See section 245(a) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1255(a). Thus, this appeal no longer appears to retain practical significance. As a matter of prudence, we will therefore dismiss it as moot. See Matter ofLuis, 22 I&N Dec. 747, 753 (BIA 1999). ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.