dismissed
EB-3
dismissed EB-3 Case: Software Engineering
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary's bachelor of science degree from Pakistan was the equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree. The academic evaluations submitted on appeal were deemed insufficient as they lacked supporting documentation, such as transcripts, and were inconsistent with information from the reliable AACRAO EDGE database.
Criteria Discussed
Foreign Degree Equivalency Educational Requirements For Professional Classification
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF N-C-0- INC Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: SEPT. 29.2017 APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION PETITION: I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, an information technology consulting and software development company, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a software engineer. It requests classification of the Beneficiary as a professional under the third preference immigrant classification. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(3)(A)(ii), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(3)(A)(ii). This employment-based immigrant classification allows a U.S. employer to sponsor a professional with a baccalaureate degree for lawful permanent resident status. The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition. The Director found that the Beneficiary does not have a U.S. bachelor's degree or a foreign equivalent degree. and therefore does not meet the minimum educational requirement of the labor certification and does not quality for classification as a professional under the Act. On appeal the Petitioner submits a brief and supporting documents. The Petitioner assetts that the Beneficiary has the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree, thus meeting the educational requirement of the labor certification and qualifYing him for classification as a professional. Upon de novo review, we will dismiss the appeal. I. LAW Employment-based immigration generally follows a three-step process. First, an employer obtains an approved labor certification from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). 1 See section 212(a)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(5)(A)(i). By approving the labor certification. DOL certifies that there are insufficient U.S. workers who are able, willing, qualified, and available for the offered position and that employing a foreign national in the position will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of domestic workers similarly employed. See section 212(a)(5)(A)(i)(I)-(II) of the Act. Second, the employer tiles an immigrant visa petition with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). See section 204 ofthe Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1154. Third, 1 The date the labor certification is filed is called the "priority date." See 8 C.F.R. ~ 204.5(d). The Petitioner must establish that all eligibility requirements for the petition have been satisfied from the priority date onward. . Matter of N-C-G- Inc if USCIS approves the petition, the foreign national applies for an immigrant visa abroad or, if eligible, adjustment of status in the United States. See section 245 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255. The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(1)(3)(ii)(C) states, in pertinent part: If the petition is for a professional, the petition must be accompanied by evidence that the [beneficiary] holds a United States baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree . . . . Evidence of a baccalaureate degree shall be in the form of an otlicial college or university record showing the date the baccalaureate degree was awarded and the area of concentration of study. A beneficiary must also meet all of the education, training, experience, and other requirements of the labor certification as of the petition's priority date. See Matter of Win1(s Tea House, 16 I&N Dec. 158, 159 (Acting Reg'l. Comm'r 1977). II. ANALYSIS The Petitioner's Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, was accompanied by an ETA Form 9089, Application for Permanent Employment Certification (labor certification), with a priority date of December 2, 2015. Section H of the labor certification stated the following with respect to the minimum requirements for the job of software engineer: 4. 4-B. 5. 6. 6-A. 7. 8. 9. 10. Education: Minimum level required: Major Field of Study: Is training required for the job? Is experience in the job offered required? How long? Is an alternate field of study acceptable? Is an alternate combination of education and experience acceptable? Is a foreign educational equivalent acceptable? Is experience in an alternate occupation acceptable? Bachelor's degree Engineering, Computer Science, Business, Science. or equivalent No Yes 12 months No No Yes No Section J of the labor certification states that the Beneficiary earned a bachelor"s degree in computer science in 2005 at the m Pakistan. As evidence of the Beneficiary's educational credentials, the Petitioner submitted copies of the Beneficiary's degree certificate from which states that the Beneficiary, "having fulfilled the prescribed requirements in the examination held in February 2006," was awarded a "BS in Computer Science" on June 16, 2007. No transcript or other evidence of specific coursework was submitted. 2 . Matter ofN-C-G- Inc In denying the petition the Director utilized the Educational Database for Global Education (EDGE), created by the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Ofticers (AACRA0), 2 whose section on Pakistan contains an entry for bachelor of science degrees. EDGE states that a bachelor of science degree from Pakistan is comparable to two to three years of university study in the United States. Based on this information from EDGE, the Director concluded that the Beneficiary's bachelor of science degree from is not equivalent to aU .S. bachelor's degree. On appeal the Petitioner submits two academic equivalency evaluations of the Beneficiary's education: one from and the other from of science in computer science from from a U.S. college or university. Both evaluations conclude that the Beneficiary's bachelor is equivalent to a bachelor's degree in computer science The evaluation claims that the Beneficiary completed a four-year degree program in 2006 and lists the courses he allegedly completed. However, no transcripts or other documentation of the Beneficiary's coursework was submitted with the evaluation. Thus, neither the duration of the Beneficiary's degree program nor the specific courses taken are corroborated in the evaluation. As for the evaluation, it also claims that the Beneficiary completed a four-year degree program at asserts that the Beneficiary's degree program comprised eight semesters of study from 2001 to 2005 and identifies some of the Petitioner's courses. Like the evaluation, however, the evaluation is deficient because it is not supported by any transcripts or other documentation corroborating its claims regarding the Beneficiary's years of study and the courses he took. claims that its equivalency evaluation is confirmed by EDGE. It refers to the EDGE credential advice pertaining to bachelor of arts, bachelor of science in engineering, and bachelor of engineering/technology degrees in Pakistan which are awarded after four years of tertiary study and, per EDGE, comparable to bachelor's degrees in the United States. The Beneficiary's degree in computer science, however, is not one of the three degree types covered by this EDGE credential advice. Nor does the record show that it was a four-year degree. Contrary to claim, therefore, its equivalency evaluation of the Beneficiary's degree is not confirmed by EDGE. Evaluations of academic credentials by evaluation services are utilized by USCIS as advisory opinions only. Where an opinion is not in accord with other information or is in any way 2 AACRAO is described on its website as "a nonprofit, voluntary, professional association of more than 11,000 higher education admissions and registration professionals who represent more than 2,600 institutions and agencies in the United States and in over 40 countries." AACRAO, http://www.aacrao.org/about (last accessed September 26, 20 17). "The mission of [AACRAO] is to provide professional development, guidelines, and voluntary standards to be used by higher education officials regarding the best practices in records management, admissions, enrollment management, administrative information technology, and student services.'' /d. EDGE is ·'a valuable resource for evaluating educational credentials earned in foreign systems." AACRAO EDGE, http://aacrao.org/aacrao solutions/aacrao-international/aacrao-edge/edge (last accessed September 26, 20 17). We consider EDGE to be a reliable, peer-reviewed source of information about foreign degree equivalencies. 3 . Matter of N-C-G- Inc questionable, USCIS is not required to accept it or may give it less weight. See Matter olSea. Inc .. 19 I&N Dec. 817 (Comm'r 1988). For the reasons discussed above, we find that the and evaluations do not establish that the Beneficiary's degree from is the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree. A bachelor's degree in the United States generally comprises four years of study. See Matter ol Shah, 17 I&N Dec. 244, 245 (Reg'! Comm'r 1977). The evidence of record does not show that the Beneficiary's bachelor of science degree in computer science from was a four-year degree program. No documentation has been submitted to show the beginning and end dates of the Beneficiary's studies at the number of semesters he studied, the courses he completed, and the credits he amassed. Thus, the Petitioner has not established that the Beneficiary's degree from IS the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree. III. CONCLUSION The Petitioner has not established that the Beneficiary has a foreign degree that is equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree, as required by the terms of the labor certification and to qualify for classification as a professional under section 203(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act. Accordingly, we will dismiss the appeal. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. Cite as Matter ofN-C-G-lnc, ID# 673254 (AAO Sept. 29, 2017) 4
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.